Legislative conference room table with documents and a person placing money.
Silicon Valley’s tech titans are launching an aggressive lobbying effort in California to quash the proposed COMPETE Act, a landmark bill that seeks to empower state regulators to prosecute single-firm monopolies. This legislation represents a significant shift from current antitrust laws, which primarily focus on companies that collude rather than those that dominate markets through their sheer size and market power.
Companies like Google, Facebook (Meta Platforms), and Uber, along with industry allies such as the California Chamber of Commerce, have poured over $6 million into lobbying against the bill. Their strategy includes significant campaign donations, totaling nearly $130,000, to four key Democratic state senators on the Judiciary Committee: Ben Allen, Angelique Ashby, Henry Stern, and Thomas Umberg. These senators are considered crucial swing votes for the bill’s potential passage.
The COMPETE Act aims to curb practices that Big Tech has been accused of, such as prioritizing their own applications and services over those of competitors, and acquiring potential rivals to stifle innovation. Consumer protection advocates champion the bill as a necessary update to antitrust enforcement, arguing it will foster greater competition, lower prices, and ultimately benefit consumers.
However, industry groups contend that the bill is vague, unnecessary, and could inadvertently harm innovation and increase costs for businesses and consumers alike. They argue that the tech sector is inherently competitive and that regulating companies based on their size would be detrimental to progress.
While Senator Allen has expressed support for the bill, the positions of the other three targeted senators are less clear. Proponents view the COMPETE Act as a potential century-defining reform in state antitrust enforcement, offering a critical check on the growing power of large technology corporations in California.
About the Author
