iOS 26 Leak Fallout: Co-Defendant Claims Jon Prosser Paid $650
Earlier this year, Apple initiated legal action against tech leaker Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti, alleging a coordinated effort to pilfer Apple’s trade secrets. The core of the accusation centers around a breach of a development iPhone to obtain confidential information, with the aim of profiting from the theft.
Ramacciotti’s Defense and the $650 Payment
In a recent court filing, Ramacciotti has contested the allegations, stating he did not conspire with Prosser. Ramacciotti asserts that the payment of $650 from Prosser was made after the fact and not agreed upon beforehand. This statement contrasts with Apple’s claims of a pre-arranged scheme.
The lawsuit details Ramacciotti’s alleged access to a development iPhone belonging to former Apple employee Ethan Lipnik. This access reportedly occurred after using location tracking to determine Lipnik’s absence. The lawsuit further alleges that Ramacciotti subsequently showcased features of the yet-unreleased iOS 26 to Prosser via a FaceTime call.
Ramacciotti admits to accessing Lipnik’s iPhone and the FaceTime call with Prosser, where the features were shown. However, he denies tracking Lipnik’s location. He claims that prior to the call, Lipnik had shown him the new iOS features, leading him to not fully appreciate the sensitivity of the development version.
The Details of the FaceTime Call
According to Ramacciotti’s filing, Prosser offered him $650 after the FaceTime call. Ramacciotti clarifies he did not solicit payment from Prosser for the information. He also claims he was unaware Prosser was recording the call, and denies possessing any additional Apple trade secrets or confidential information.
The Legal Battle Continues
While Prosser has communicated with Apple regarding the lawsuit, he has not yet responded to it. A default has been entered against Prosser, which allows the case to proceed even without his response. Apple intends to file for a default judgment against Prosser, signaling the legal proceedings’ ongoing intensity.
This case highlights the complexities surrounding tech leaks, trade secrets, and the legal repercussions faced by those involved. As the legal battle unfolds, further revelations are expected.
Source: The Verge
About the Author
