Latvian Parliament Votes to Withdraw from Istanbul Convention
In a move that has drawn both criticism and concern, the Latvian Parliament voted on Thursday to withdraw from the Istanbul Convention, a key European treaty aimed at preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. This decision could position Latvia as the first European Union member state to take such action.
The Vote and Its Implications
The vote saw 56 parliamentarians in favor of withdrawal, while 32 voted against it, with two abstentions. The decision now awaits the signature of President Edgars Rinkēvičs to become official. However, President Rinkēvičs has indicated his disapproval of the move, although he also appears hesitant to overturn the parliamentary decision. The Istanbul Convention, established by the Council of Europe, mandates signatory parties to develop laws and policies to address violence against women and domestic abuse.
Political Divide and Controversy
The political landscape in Latvia reflects a clear division over the issue. Right-wing opposition parties supported the withdrawal, while the ruling coalition, led by Prime Minister Ivika Siliņa, showed internal division. The Union of Greens and Farmers voted in favor of withdrawal, while other parties within the coalition opposed it. This split highlights the complex nature of the debate and the varying perspectives on the convention’s implications.
Key Arguments and Counterarguments
Those in favor of withdrawal, primarily right-wing factions, argue that the convention promotes gender theories. They assert that existing laws are sufficient to combat violence against women. However, the Council of Europe has repeatedly refuted claims that the convention imposes gender or sexual identity theories, emphasizing that the treaty does not establish new standards on these matters. The Marta Centre, a prominent advocate for women’s and immigrants’ rights, has highlighted the tangible positive outcomes resulting from the convention’s ratification in Latvia, emphasizing the lives it has helped save.
Broader Context and Future Concerns
The recent developments in Latvia, including the vote on the Istanbul Convention, also come against the backdrop of other concerning proposals. Right-wing groups recently supported a measure to restrict access to abortion in the country. Groups like the Marta Centre have organized multiple protests in Riga in recent weeks, showing growing concern about these shifts in policy.
The decision by the Latvian Parliament reflects a broader debate about the role of international treaties, gender equality, and the interpretation of social norms. The situation underscores the ongoing challenges in addressing violence against women and the importance of continued dialogue and action on this critical issue. The EU and the Council of Europe have played a crucial role in shaping the response to gender-based violence, and this vote marks a significant moment for the bloc.
Source: Annahar
About the Author
