The fluorescent lights of the robotics lab hummed, casting a sterile glow on the disassembled Roomba. Engineers hunched over circuit boards, their faces illuminated by the green glare of oscilloscopes. It was a scene that, until recently, would have been filled with the promise of future product launches. Now, the atmosphere was thick with the quiet desperation of a company staring down the barrel of bankruptcy.
iRobot, Luminar, and Rad Power Bikes – each a once-promising player in the hardware game – all filed for bankruptcy in the same week. Each faced its own set of problems, yet together, they tell a larger story about the brutal realities of building physical products in an era of global trade tensions and relentless competition. The confluence of challenges is almost overwhelming: tariff pressures, supply chain issues, and shifting market demands have created a perfect storm.
“It’s a classic case of too many factors converging at once,” said Sarah Jones, a senior analyst at Forrester. “You have companies that bet big on certain markets, only to see those markets shift, sometimes abruptly. Then you add in the complications of sourcing components, rising labor costs, and the ever-present threat of cheaper overseas competitors. It’s a recipe for disaster.”
Luminar, the lidar sensor maker, had positioned itself as a key supplier for the autonomous vehicle market. But the timeline for widespread adoption of self-driving cars has been pushed back, and the company struggled to secure large-scale contracts. The market, once predicted to reach $10 billion by 2026, has cooled considerably, and the company’s projections have been forced to adjust. Then came the supply chain shocks. The company’s over-reliance on a single chip supplier, a problem exacerbated by US export controls, further complicated matters.
Rad Power Bikes, which had ridden the wave of e-bike popularity, faced a different set of challenges. While demand for e-bikes remained strong, the company was hit hard by rising material costs, especially for batteries and other components. The company’s business model, built on direct-to-consumer sales, was also vulnerable to changing consumer behavior and increased competition from both established bike manufacturers and new entrants. They were caught in the middle.
The situation at iRobot was equally complex. While the company’s Roomba vacuum cleaners were a household name, the company struggled to adapt to a changing market. Competition from cheaper rivals, coupled with rising manufacturing costs and the impact of tariffs, eroded its margins. The company’s acquisition by Amazon, which was supposed to be a lifeline, was blocked by regulators, leaving iRobot vulnerable.
The bankruptcies of these three companies are a stark reminder of the challenges facing the hardware industry. Building physical products is a capital-intensive business, and companies must navigate a complex web of supply chains, market dynamics, and regulatory hurdles. For those who fail to adapt, the consequences can be swift and severe. The recent downturn shows the risks of the hardware world – a world where success demands agility, foresight, and a healthy dose of luck.
About the Author
